test-evidence-review

To audit test evidence for acceptance criteria coverage, evaluate per-story test artifacts against documented sign-offs to identify missing tests and documentation gaps across in-sprint stories.

Test evidence gap analysis identifies missing tests and documentation across sprints by auditing unit, integration, and visual QA artifacts to ensure proper coverage and reduce reliance on simple existence checks.

Yes, you can flag flaky or skipped tests during an in-sprint QA sign-off using anti-pattern detection, which evaluates deterministic tests and produces per-story verdicts highlighting stale artifacts.

Generate per-story verdicts for production story evidence by running an on-demand audit that checks acceptance criteria coverage, deterministic tests, and documented sign-off status across unit, integration, and visual QA artifacts.

Yes, this approach works for both in-sprint QA sign-offs and sprint reviews, as well as on-demand audits of production story evidence, producing per-story verdicts and highlighting anti-patterns like flaky tests.

Simple existence checking fails for test documentation because it does not verify acceptance criteria coverage or enforce deterministic test checks, missing anti-patterns like flaky tests, skipped tests, or stale artifacts.