test-evidence-review

You can review test evidence by running an automated assessment that analyzes test files and manual artifacts for assertion coverage, edge-case handling, naming quality, and sign-off completeness. It evaluates scope across single stories, sprints, or entire systems to confirm evaluation criteria are thoroughly met.

Assertion coverage measures the presence and quality of validation statements within test files. It impacts QA sign-offs by verifying that test evidence is thorough, correctly scoped, and actively asserts expected behaviors rather than merely executing code without validating outcomes.

You can audit test evidence at multiple scopes. This skill applies scope-aware evaluation to single stories, current sprints, or entire systems, generating a comprehensive quality assessment that reports on edge cases, naming quality, and sign-off completeness for the selected scope.

Assessing edge-case handling requires analyzing test files to identify whether boundary conditions and unexpected inputs are covered. This skill automates that review by evaluating test evidence to ensure edge cases are explicitly addressed alongside standard assertion coverage before sign-off.

The best way to check manual evidence completeness is to review artifacts for required sign-offs and documentation scope. This skill evaluates manual evidence documents to ensure they are thorough, correctly scoped, and ready for QA sign-off rather than just confirming their presence.

Test evidence can pass execution but fail sign-offs when assertion coverage is insufficient, edge cases are unhandled, or naming quality is poor. A story audit evaluates whether evidence is thorough and correctly scoped, ensuring required sign-offs and evaluation criteria are fully met.