Test Results Analyzer

Analyzes test execution results to generate quality metrics, defect predictions, and release readiness reports.

2|Updated May 21, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/tcvdog/agency-agents-hermes --skill test-results-analyzer-tcvdog
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: Test Results Analyzer
Source: https://github.com/tcvdog/agency-agents-hermes/tree/main/testing/test-results-analyzer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/tcvdog/agency-agents-hermes --skill test-results-analyzer-tcvdog

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Raw test output is hard to act on: teams struggle to spot failure patterns, judge release readiness, and communicate quality risk to stakeholders. This Skill turns test result data into statistical insights, defect predictions, and go/no-go recommendations. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Test Coverage & Failure Analysis: Evaluates line, branch, and function coverage, identifies gaps, and categorizes failures by type with root cause analysis. - Defect Prediction & Risk Assessment: Uses machine learning models (e.g., RandomForestClassifier) to predict defect-prone areas and compute release readiness with confidence levels. - Stakeholder Reporting: Produces executive dashboards and technical reports with quality KPIs, ROI analysis, and prioritized recommendations. - Use Case: After a CI pipeline run, feed the JSON test results to the analyzer to get a release readiness score, top quality risks, and a go/no-go recommendation backed by statistical confidence. ## Quick Start Analyze the test results in results.json and produce a release readiness report with coverage gaps, failure patterns, and a go/no-go recommendation.

Frequently Asked Questions about Test Results Analyzer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I analyze test results to decide release readiness?▼

Aggregate pass rates, coverage thresholds, performance SLA compliance, and defect density into readiness criteria, then compute an overall risk score with a confidence level. The analysis produces a go/no-go recommendation with supporting reasoning.

How to predict defect-prone code areas with machine learning?▼

Extract code metrics as features and train a classifier such as RandomForestClassifier on historical defect data. The model outputs defect probabilities per area plus feature importance scores to guide targeted testing.

What metrics should a test coverage analysis report include?▼

Include line, branch, function, and statement coverage percentages, plus a gap analysis listing files below an 80% threshold with risk level and priority. Trend data over time helps track improvement.

Can test failure patterns be categorized automatically?▼

Yes, failures can be grouped into functional, performance, security, and integration categories, then analyzed for trends and root causes. Statistical methods validate whether observed patterns are significant rather than noise.

What are the limitations of statistical test result analysis?▼

Conclusions depend on data quality and completeness; small sample sizes reduce statistical confidence. Predictive models also require sufficient historical defect data and must be retrained as the codebase evolves.