test-review-criteria

Evaluate test code quality against structured review criteria.

Updated Aug 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/sato-dev1234/claude-code-sample --skill test-review-criteria
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: test-review-criteria
Source: https://github.com/sato-dev1234/claude-code-sample/tree/main/skills/test-review-criteria
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/sato-dev1234/claude-code-sample --skill test-review-criteria

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Helps QA engineers and developers evaluate test code quality by applying a structured review framework.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured criteria: A comprehensive set of rules covering test code quality, flaky patterns, and assertion quality to guide reviews.
  • Actionable feedback: Generates concrete improvement recommendations for flaky patterns, missing assertions, and coverage gaps.
  • Review workflow integration: Aligns with standard code review processes to streamline QA collaboration.
  • Use Case: During PR reviews, quickly assess new tests for edge-case coverage and suggest fixes.

Quick Start

Run the test change through the criteria to obtain a prioritized feedback report.

Frequently Asked Questions about test-review-criteria

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate test code review for flaky patterns and missing assertions?

Automating test code review applies a structured criteria framework to evaluate test code quality, identifying flaky patterns, missing assertions, and coverage gaps to generate actionable feedback.

What is a structured test review criteria framework for QA audits?

A test review criteria framework is a formal set of rules evaluating assertion quality and test coverage, used during QA audits to guide reviews and ensure consistent code quality assessment.

How do I integrate test quality checks into pull request code reviews?

Integrating test quality checks into PR reviews runs new test changes through criteria-based analysis, producing a prioritized feedback report with concrete improvement recommendations for edge-case coverage.

Can I use automated test review criteria to find coverage gaps in software development?

Automated test review criteria can find coverage gaps in software development projects by applying formal analysis to test code, evaluating assertion quality and detecting missing edge-case validations.

What are the limitations of using criteria-based analysis for test code quality?

Criteria-based analysis for test code quality focuses on flaky patterns, missing assertions, and coverage gaps, requiring enforced frontmatter metadata to generate structured actionable feedback.