tests-adversarial

Write adversarial tests that violate assumptions and expose failure paths.

5|2|Updated Nov 17, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/OutlineDriven/odin-gemini-cli-extension --skill tests-adversarial
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: tests-adversarial
Source: https://github.com/OutlineDriven/odin-gemini-cli-extension/tree/main/skills/tests-adversarial
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/OutlineDriven/odin-gemini-cli-extension --skill tests-adversarial

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Adversarial testing identifies hidden failure paths by systematically violating program assumptions and edge cases, revealing vulnerabilities that standard tests miss.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Assumption hunting: For each function or module, explicitly document and test the assumptions the code makes.
  • Attack vectors: Use adversarial inputs, timing twists, and state mutations to expose robustness gaps and error-handling weaknesses.
  • Validation & recovery: Ensure meaningful error messages, proper rollback behavior, and recovery paths after failures.
  • Use Case: Harden API boundaries where inputs may be malformed, incomplete, or unexpected, and ensure the system fails safely.

Quick Start

Frame tests that violate each assumption and run the full suite to reveal hidden failure modes.

Frequently Asked Questions about tests-adversarial

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
What is adversarial testing and how does it find hidden failure paths?

Adversarial testing identifies hidden failure paths by systematically violating program assumptions and edge cases, revealing robustness gaps and error-handling vulnerabilities that standard tests miss.

How do I write tests that validate boundary handling and state transitions?

Write tests that apply adversarial inputs, timing twists, and state mutations to stress boundary handling and state transitions, then document the assumptions violated to reveal robustness gaps.

How do I test error recovery and rollback behavior under adverse conditions?

Test error recovery by injecting adverse conditions and validating that the system produces meaningful error messages, executes proper rollback behavior, and recovers safely from failure.

Does this approach work for hardening API boundaries with malformed inputs?

Yes, adversarial testing hardens API boundaries by systematically injecting malformed, incomplete, or unexpected inputs to ensure the system fails safely and validates recovery paths.

What is the best way to document assumptions for robustness testing?

Document assumptions by explicitly listing the constraints each function or module relies on, then frame violation tests that directly break those constraints to expose failure modes.