What problem does it solve?
Enables rigorous architectural critique and refinement through a structured adversarial debate among specialized agents (Proposer, Devils-Advocate, Synthesizer) with Don oversight, ensuring robust designs before Sit-Down.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Structured Multi-Agent Debate (MAD) protocol that surfaces architectural trade-offs, risks, and alternate solutions.
- Per-round Don participation and, in Autonomous Mode, delegation to a don-proxy while preserving final authority.
- Clear termination conditions (Nash Equilibrium, Don consensus, or round-limit) to prevent endless debates.
- Full-cycle integration: from Reconnaissance results to revised proposals via the Synthesizer, with traceable objections and responses.
- Supports both human-in-the-loop and autonomous workflows within gangsta framework.
Quick Start
Initiate a The Grilling session after Reconnaissance completes; the system will coordinate Proposer, Devils-Advocate, and Synthesizer to produce a revised proposal.