theory-generalize

Analyze proven theorems to propose feasible generalizations across axes.

7|1|Updated Mar 19, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Shiien/Self-Evolved-Research-Framework --skill theory-generalize
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: theory-generalize
Source: https://github.com/Shiien/Self-Evolved-Research-Framework/tree/main/skills/theory-generalize
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Shiien/Self-Evolved-Research-Framework --skill theory-generalize

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Propose generalizations of proven results across axes (weaker assumptions, higher dimensions, different norms, or stochastic versions) and assess which proof steps would break.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Propose generalizations along multiple axes (weaker assumptions, higher dimensions, different norms, stochastic versions)
  • Assess feasibility of each generalization and identify breaking proof steps
  • Recommend most promising generalization direction and chain to the next skill (theory-decompose)

Quick Start

Provide a proven result and its assumptions, then request generalized versions and feasibility analysis across axes.

Frequently Asked Questions about theory-generalize

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I generalize a mathematical theorem to higher dimensions or different norms?

To generalize a mathematical theorem, provide the proven result, its assumptions, and a proof sketch. The analysis identifies feasible generalizations across axes like higher dimensions, different norms, and weaker assumptions, detailing expected proof changes and breaking steps.

What is the best way to assess feasibility when generalizing a proof to weaker assumptions?

Assessing feasibility for generalizing a proof involves providing the original theorem and assumptions to analyze which proof steps would break under weaker assumptions, yielding a structured report on expected proof changes and a recommended generalization direction.

Can I analyze stochastic versions of a proven lemma without starting the proof from scratch?

Yes, you can analyze stochastic versions by inputting the proven lemma and its proof sketch. The system articulates generalized extensions across axis variations and identifies exactly which steps of your existing proof will break under the stochastic transformation.

Do I need a complete formal proof to check if a theorem can be generalized?

You do not need a complete formal proof, but you must input a proven theorem with its assumptions and a proof sketch. This input is required to generate the structured generalization analysis detailing feasible extensions and expected proof modifications across axes.

How do I identify which proof steps will break when extending a result to a stochastic version?

To identify breaking proof steps when extending a result to a stochastic version, input the proven theorem and its proof sketch. The analysis assesses the feasibility of the stochastic generalization and explicitly maps out the expected proof changes and failures.

What should I do after finding the most promising generalization direction for a theorem?

After identifying the most promising generalization direction for a theorem, you should decompose the generalized proof into manageable steps. The analysis recommends a generalization direction and chains directly to the next skill for theory decomposition.