thermo-nuclear-code-quality-review

To prevent spaghetti code and maintainability regressions, you need a rigorous code review that flags ad-hoc conditionals, feature logic leakage, and unclear type boundaries. It enforces structural simplification by prioritizing code-judo opportunities that delete complexity while preserving behavior.

Enforcing file decomposition and modularity guardrails requires treating 1k+ line crossings and missing decomposition as high-severity maintainability smells. A strict audit blocks structural regressions and demands an explicit restructuring plan for architectural correction.

Auditing abstraction quality and boundary cleanliness involves evaluating a PR's implementation for structural simplification and feature logic leakage into shared flows. It requires direct review that blocks unclear contract boundaries and enforces explicit guidance for architectural correction.

Yes, a strict code review process can demand structural simplification for giant files by applying file-size hygiene guardrails. It treats files growing past healthy size limits as a high-severity maintainability smell and blocks the PR until decomposition is applied.

You should demand a code-judo restructuring plan instead of basic cleanup when a PR introduces spaghetti branching or leaks feature logic across boundaries. It pushes beyond standard cleanup into restructurings that eliminate complexity while preserving behavior.