thermos

Run dual thermo review passes in parallel and synthesize deduplicated findings.

2|Updated Apr 3, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/kscius/KS-Cursor-Orchestrator --skill thermos
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: thermos
Source: https://github.com/kscius/KS-Cursor-Orchestrator/tree/main/skills/thermos
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/kscius/KS-Cursor-Orchestrator --skill thermos

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Coordinate dual thermo review passes in parallel and synthesize their findings to shorten cycle times while increasing coverage.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Dual parallel reviews: Launch both thermo-nuclear review subagents in parallel to evaluate changes simultaneously.
  • Synthesis and deduplication: Combine findings from both passes, deduplicate overlaps, and surface a unified verdict.
  • Targeted scenarios: Use for combined bug/security and code-quality branch reviews or thermo-dominated audits.

Quick Start

Trigger thermos when both review passes are required, and the system will run them in parallel and present a unified set of findings.

Frequently Asked Questions about thermos

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run parallel code reviews for bug, security, and code-quality audits on a PR?

You can run parallel code reviews by launching dual subagents simultaneously in the same context. This coordinates bug, security, and code-quality audits across branches or PRs to maximize coverage and shorten cycle times.

What is the best way to deduplicate overlapping findings from multiple code review passes?

The best way to deduplicate overlapping findings is to synthesize results from parallel review passes. Combining outputs removes redundant issues and delivers a unified verdict with prioritized findings.

Can I use parallel subagents to review both security and code-quality changes simultaneously?

Yes, you can use parallel subagents to review security and code-quality changes simultaneously. The system launches both review passes in the same context and synthesizes their combined findings into a unified report.

How do I get a unified verdict with prioritized issues from separate branch reviews?

To get a unified verdict with prioritized issues from separate branch reviews, apply a dual parallel review process. It synthesizes and deduplicates findings from both passes into a single prioritized list.

When should I use a parallel review synthesis approach instead of sequential code reviews?

Use a parallel review synthesis approach when you need to shorten cycle times while increasing coverage. It is targeted for combined bug, security, and code-quality branch reviews where sequential passes would be too slow.