think-lite

Classify routine technical problems into Cynefin domains and run tailored thinking pipelines.

Updated May 6, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/HMWKR/claude-code-skills --skill think-lite
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: think-lite
Source: https://github.com/HMWKR/claude-code-skills/tree/main/skills/think-lite
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/HMWKR/claude-code-skills --skill think-lite

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Users often waste cognitive resources overthinking simple routine tasks or underthinking complex problems, leading to inefficient analysis, missed details, and delayed decision-making for everyday coding and analytical work.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Adaptive Complexity Classification: Uses the Cynefin framework to automatically categorize problems into 5 distinct domains (Clear, Complicated, Complex, Chaotic, Confusion) to match thinking depth to need.
  • Tailored Thinking Pipelines: Runs 2-6 step customized workflows for each problem type, from 3-step fast paths for simple bugs to 6-step probe-based workflows for novel system design.
  • Use Case: Perfect for daily coding bug fixes, quick task triage, lightweight architecture planning, and team alignment on routine projects where full deep analysis would be unnecessary.

Quick Start

Ask the AI to run the think-lite skill to analyze your recent routine coding task and select the optimal thinking path for it.

Frequently Asked Questions about think-lite

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I match my cognitive effort to problem complexity during routine coding tasks?

To match cognitive effort to problem complexity, you can apply an adaptive thinking pipeline that uses the Cynefin framework to classify issues and route them to appropriately scaled workflows. This prevents overthinking simple bugs or underthinking novel system designs.

What is the best way to triage quick coding tasks without overthinking them?

The best way to triage quick coding tasks is using a lightweight classification process that sorts problems into distinct domains. This automatically applies a fast 3-step path for simple bugs and reserves deeper 6-step probes for genuine complexities.

How does the Cynefin framework classify problems for adaptive technical decision-making?

The Cynefin framework classifies problems for adaptive technical decision-making by sorting them into five distinct domains: Clear, Complicated, Complex, Chaotic, and Confusion. Each domain triggers a tailored 2-to-6 step thinking pipeline.

Do I need deep architectural analysis for lightweight design reviews and team alignment?

You do not need deep architectural analysis for lightweight design reviews and team alignment. Scaled adaptive thinking applies customized workflows that provide sufficient cognitive depth for routine projects without wasting time on unnecessary full analysis.

Can I use a scaled thinking pipeline for both simple bug fixes and novel system design?

You can use a scaled thinking pipeline for both simple bug fixes and novel system design. It automatically adjusts execution paths, running fast 3-step workflows for simple fixes and 6-step probe-based workflows for complex architectural scenarios.

When should I avoid using adaptive thinking pipelines for code analysis?

You should avoid using adaptive thinking pipelines for code analysis when a situation requires full deep analysis rather than routine technical work. The pipeline is built specifically to eliminate wasted time on everyday tasks, not to handle exhaustive architectural audits.