think-mode

Select a read-only OpenCode workflow based on question uncertainty and framing.

8|Updated Jun 18, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/vhqtvn/vh-solara --skill think-mode
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: think-mode
Source: https://github.com/vhqtvn/vh-solara/tree/main/.opencode/skills/think-mode
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/vhqtvn/vh-solara --skill think-mode

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Think-mode helps you decide which read-only OpenCode workflow fits a question before you spend time on the wrong shape of analysis. It prevents unnecessary research, debate, or solution-brief work when the framing is already clear or when the uncertainty is still evolving.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Workflow selection: Chooses between build, researcher, debate, one-shot solution-brief, and phased solution-brief.
  • Uncertainty shaping: Distinguishes factual gaps from choice-making, and stable framing from stakeholder-driven ambiguity.
  • Practical use case: Use it when you are unsure whether to research, debate, or brief a problem, or when a new stakeholder constraint means the plan should be reconsidered.

Quick Start

Ask the think-mode skill which read-only workflow should handle your question and provide the current context, uncertainty, and desired outcome.

Frequently Asked Questions about think-mode

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I choose the right read-only workflow for decision making?

Choosing a read-only workflow requires evaluating your question's uncertainty to select between researcher, debate, or solution-brief modes, preventing wasted analysis on the wrong session shape. The skill returns a scaffolded prompt with operator gating to guide the process.

When should I use a debate workflow versus a solution brief?

Use a debate workflow when distinguishing factual gaps from active choice-making, and use a solution-brief when stable framing is needed. The skill evaluates stakeholder-driven ambiguity to determine whether one-shot or phased solution-briefing is appropriate.

What is the best way to select an OpenCode workflow for ambiguous decisions?

The best way to select an OpenCode workflow is by assessing whether facts, options, or framing need different treatment. The skill applies uncertainty shaping to choose among direct build, researcher, debate, and solution-brief workflows.

Do I need to re-evaluate my workflow selection when a new stakeholder constraint is introduced?

Yes, you need to re-evaluate workflow selection when a new stakeholder constraint means the plan should be reconsidered. The skill distinguishes stable framing from stakeholder-driven ambiguity to prevent unnecessary research or debate on outdated parameters.

How do I start workflow selection for a question using think-mode?

To start workflow selection, ask the skill which read-only workflow should handle your question and provide the current context, uncertainty, and desired outcome. It then returns a scaffolded prompt with operator gating for execution.