What problem does it solve?
It prevents high-impact security mistakes by forcing teams to define an explicit threat model that maps assets, trust boundaries, abuse cases, mitigations, and residual risk before implementation.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Threat modeling with concrete abuse cases: Enumerates assets and actors (including insider/abuse-of-trust scenarios) to expose both attacker and legitimate-workflow misuse paths.
- Trust-boundary driven risk design: Draws every trust boundary crossing (client→API gateway, gateway→backend, backend→DB, backend→third-party, admin UI→admin API) and requires validation/authorization design per boundary.
- Mitigations tied to evidence: Requires each mitigation to include an implementation location, an executable/automated test ID or description, and production monitoring signals, plus explicit residual-risk acceptance with owner and review date.
Quick Start
Use the threat-modeling capability to produce a structured threat model for your planned change by providing the entry points, data flows, trust boundaries, and the specific mitigations you intend to implement.