three-body-council

Facilitate multi-model AI deliberation and response evaluation through structured three-round debates.

Updated Aug 23, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/sadiehertzig/clawdia-hertz-openclaw --skill three-body-council
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: three-body-council
Source: https://github.com/sadiehertzig/clawdia-hertz-openclaw/tree/main/agents/clawdia/skills/three-body-council
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/sadiehertzig/clawdia-hertz-openclaw --skill three-body-council

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires requests, and includes scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill addresses the challenge of obtaining high-quality, well-reasoned answers and provides a robust method for evaluating AI-generated content by leveraging the collective intelligence of multiple advanced AI models.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Multi-Model Deliberation: Convenes three leading AI models (Claude Opus, GPT-5, Gemini Pro) for a structured three-round debate to synthesize a superior answer.
  • Automated Evaluation: Acts as an objective grading panel to assess AI responses against defined criteria, ensuring accuracy, completeness, and safety.
  • Use Case: Use deliberation mode to get the most comprehensive answer to a complex technical question. Use evaluation mode to automatically grade customer support bot responses for factual accuracy and helpfulness.

Quick Start

Use the three-body-council skill to convene the council and ask "What is the best approach to implementing a PID controller?".

Frequently Asked Questions about three-body-council

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I use multiple AI models to evaluate and grade LLM responses?

Multi-model evaluation grades LLM responses by convening models like Claude Opus, GPT-5, and Gemini Pro as an objective panel. This automated grading assesses AI outputs against defined assertions and rubrics to ensure factual accuracy, completeness, and safety.

What is multi-model AI deliberation for synthesizing answers?

Multi-model AI deliberation is a structured three-round debate process where leading models argue and refine their positions. This approach leverages collective intelligence to synthesize a superior, well-reasoned answer for complex technical questions.

Can I use multi-model deliberation with Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google AI APIs?

Yes, multi-model deliberation integrates directly with Anthropic, OpenAI, and Google AI APIs for model access. You can convene models like Claude Opus, GPT-5, and Gemini Pro simultaneously to generate synthesized answers or grade outputs.

What is the best way to evaluate customer support bot responses for factual accuracy?

The best way to evaluate customer support bot responses is using an automated grading panel that checks outputs against specific assertions and rubrics. This multi-model evaluation ensures the responses meet factual accuracy and helpfulness criteria.

Do I need the requests library to run multi-model AI evaluation scripts?

Yes, you need the requests library installed as a dependency to run the multi-model AI evaluation scripts. These scripts facilitate the API integrations and structured debate processes required for both deliberation and grading.

How does multi-model AI deliberation compare to using a single LLM for complex questions?

Multi-model deliberation convenes multiple leading models for a structured three-round debate, whereas a single LLM relies on one perspective. This collective intelligence approach synthesizes a more comprehensive and well-reasoned answer than single-model generation.