tool-interactive-critic-skill

You can verify code correctness and factual claims by applying external tools to validate initial outputs. This post-generation critique process selects appropriate tools like web search, tests, or linting to challenge key claims, incorporates the feedback for guided revision, and stops when major risks are resolved.

Tool-assisted review is a structured verification layer that uses external tools to critique and validate generated results before finalization. It targets unverified confidence by checking factual claims, current data, code behavior, API responses, and safety constraints to produce trustworthy output.

Provide an initial draft, then invoke the tool-based critic to verify important claims and refine the result. The system selects appropriate verification tools to challenge key points, incorporates tool feedback for guided revision without unnecessary rewrites, and clearly flags remaining uncertainties.

You need post-generation verification when outputs contain unverified confidence regarding factual data, code correctness, or safety assumptions. It is essential for technical planning, explanations, and policy-adhering tasks where risks of incorrect API responses or safety constraint violations are high.

Yes, tool-based critique works for checking API responses and safety constraints by selecting appropriate external tools to validate these specific areas. It applies a structured verification layer to ensure policy adherence and safe handoff, stopping after major risks are resolved.

A limitation of external tool-based verification is that it stops after major risks are resolved rather than achieving absolute certainty. It relies on selecting appropriate tools for the context and clearly flags remaining uncertainties, but cannot guarantee completely error-free final output.