trace

Evidence-driven tracing in Claude team mode orchestrates competing hypotheses to explain observed runtime anomalies. It gathers evidence in parallel across multiple tracer lanes, ranks the hypotheses, and produces a structured synthesis to accelerate root-cause discovery.

Tracing performance issues with competing hypotheses involves spawning distinct tracer lanes to gather evidence simultaneously. The process ranks each hypothesis based on gathered evidence, applies rebuttal rounds, and outputs a final synthesis with a discriminating probe for next steps.

Structured tracing supports architecture decisions and configuration behaviors by restating the observation and generating diverse hypotheses. It evaluates evidence across three lanes and delivers a ranked synthesis with a critical unknown to guide decision making.

Start a team-mode trace for a runtime bug by describing the observed result. The tracer generates three distinct hypotheses by default, gathers evidence in parallel, and ranks them to produce a structured final synthesis suitable for decision making.

Generating multiple hypotheses improves root-cause discovery by comparing diverse explanations of observed bugs. The three-lane tracing approach gathers evidence in parallel, applies rebuttal rounds, and prioritizes hypotheses to reveal the most likely cause.

Claude team mode tracing operates without external dependencies. It leverages the built-in team mode to orchestrate tracer lanes, gather evidence, and generate a ranked synthesis with a discriminating probe entirely within the workflow.