trails-warden-advisory

To classify Trails hardening findings by owner source, you map each finding to authoritative sources, determine the Warden tier, lifecycle stage, and diagnostic shape to identify the appropriate rule home and enforcement approach.

Determining where a Trails audit finding should live involves evaluating the owner source, Warden tier, lifecycle, and false-positive risk to decide between Warden, repo-local Oxlint, docs, an advisory skill, or no rule.

You need Warden tier classification for governance reviews when mapping prevention candidates to rule doctrine, requiring evidence-backed criteria for placement and subsequent enforcement actions across framework audits.

Yes, the advisory workflow applies to framework audits and governance reviews across Warden sources and topo awareness, providing structured guidance to document authoritative sources and recommended contexts for governance decisions.

Mapping Trails findings to rule doctrine requires defining the rule home, owner source, projection target, lifecycle, and diagnostic shape, utilizing accepted and rejected examples for decision support during placement.

Classifying hardening findings by diagnostic shape requires careful evaluation of false-positive risk to determine if a prevention candidate should become a Warden rule, repo-local Oxlint rule, or documentation only.