transcript-critic

Provide the full transcript and explicitly ask for a critique or review. The Skill runs seven independent checks covering claim classification, consensus auditing, interrupted topics, hidden dependencies, scope drift, severity mismatch, and authority dynamics, then reports findings with exact quotes.

The consensus audit check verifies who explicitly agreed, who agreed only after being overruled or interrupted, and who was never asked. It produces a consensus matrix showing each participant's stated position, whether agreement was genuine, and the supporting evidence.

No. Summarization is explicitly prohibited by the Skill's hard rules. It only critiques decision-making quality when you explicitly request a critique, review, or diagnosis, and it never rewrites the transcript or makes decisions for you.

It produces a structured Markdown report with meeting metadata, critical findings with severity and exact quote evidence, a consensus audit table, a deferred-topics dependency table, and an ordered list of diagnostic questions for the next meeting.

Do not use it when you want a summary, a rewrite, or a decision made for you. It is designed only for explicit critique requests after meetings where decisions were made, before acting on notes, or when preparing follow-up questions.