Coordinate distinct analytical voices around a shared thesis in structured strategic analysis.
npx skills add https://github.com/rbtkhn/grace-mar --skill tri-mind
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: tri-mind Source: https://github.com/rbtkhn/grace-mar/tree/main/.cursor/skills/tri-mind Command: npx skills add https://github.com/rbtkhn/grace-mar --skill tri-mind
This Skill solves the challenge of producing structured strategic analysis from multiple defined perspectives without collapsing distinct viewpoints into a single generic answer.
Use the tri-mind skill to analyze the provided thesis using lens selection A, B, or C.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
Multi-perspective strategic analysis is structured by coordinating distinct analytical voices using fixed lens mappings and ordered response procedures. This preserves viewpoint separation and prevents distinct perspectives from collapsing into a single generic answer.
A roundtable reasoning mode for geopolitical analysis is a structured debate format that coordinates distinct analytical voices with defined ordering rules. It produces distinct in-voice arguments, cross-replies, and unresolved tensions while maintaining strict viewpoint separation.
Setting up analysis workflows involves selecting specific lenses from a controlled A/B/C selection model and choosing a mode: solo analysis, two-person duets, litigator-close sequences, or full roundtables. Ordered response procedures and bounded outputs maintain workflow consistency across all modes.
Strategic analysis uses fixed lens mappings to maintain viewpoint separation and workflow consistency. The skill applies specific perspectives like Mercouris, Mearsheimer, and Barnes through a controlled A/B/C selection model, requiring bounded analysis outputs to preserve distinct in-voice arguments.
Multi-perspective analysis collapses into a generic answer when fixed lens mappings and ordered response procedures are not applied. Structured debate modes with bounded analysis outputs are required to preserve viewpoint separation and generate distinct in-voice arguments with unresolved tensions.
Litigator-close sequences are used for strategic analysis when a summarized argumentative conclusion is needed after distinct viewpoints are presented. Full roundtables are preferred when the goal is to surface cross-replies and unresolved tensions without collapsing perspectives into a final synthesis.
yipng05-maxGenerate A/B/C-specific thesis theoretical framework sections from TA framework outputs.
peelCoordinates AI model debates to synthesize architectural design recommendations.
blueskies1818Monitor RSS feeds, JSON APIs, and GitHub repositories for new items or changes.
lshtramSimulate three specialized viewpoint debates to surface blind spots in complex decisions.
