triage

Classify development tasks into DO_IT_NOW, LITE_SPEC, or METAPLAN routes.

1|Updated Apr 13, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/t-uda/skills --skill triage-t-uda
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: triage
Source: https://github.com/t-uda/skills/tree/main/skills/triage
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/t-uda/skills --skill triage-t-uda

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Classify an incoming development task into one of three routes: DO_IT_NOW, LITE_SPEC, or METAPLAN to keep planning overhead proportional to task difficulty.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Route classification and guidance to select the appropriate planning depth for a task.
  • Evaluation criteria including Ambiguity, Blast radius, Reversibility, Interruption risk, and Review value.
  • Clear examples and guidance for common scenarios (small edits, medium features, architecture changes, etc.).

Quick Start

Describe the task and context, and I will assign the appropriate routing path (DO_IT_NOW, LITE_SPEC, or METAPLAN).

Frequently Asked Questions about triage

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I decide the right planning depth for a development task?

Task routing classifies development work into three planning paths: DO_IT_NOW for small edits, LITE_SPEC for medium features, and METAPLAN for architectural changes. This prevents under-planning complex work and over-planning simple fixes.

How do I route incoming development tasks based on ambiguity and scope?

Task routing classifies development work into three planning paths: DO_IT_NOW for small edits, LITE_SPEC for medium features, and METAPLAN for architectural changes. This prevents under-planning complex work and over-planning simple fixes.

When should I use a lite spec versus a metaplan for feature work?

Task routing classifies development work into three planning paths: DO_IT_NOW for small edits, LITE_SPEC for medium features, and METAPLAN for architectural changes. This prevents under-planning complex work and over-planning simple fixes.

What is the best way to classify agile development tasks by impact and reversibility?

Task routing classifies development work into three planning paths: DO_IT_NOW for small edits, LITE_SPEC for medium features, and METAPLAN for architectural changes. This prevents under-planning complex work and over-planning simple fixes.

Can I use task classification routing for small code edits and architectural changes alike?

Task routing classifies development work into three planning paths: DO_IT_NOW for small edits, LITE_SPEC for medium features, and METAPLAN for architectural changes. This prevents under-planning complex work and over-planning simple fixes.

Why does task planning overhead become disproportionate to task difficulty?

Task routing classifies development work into three planning paths: DO_IT_NOW for small edits, LITE_SPEC for medium features, and METAPLAN for architectural changes. This prevents under-planning complex work and over-planning simple fixes.