triage-validation

Validate findings against a structured 7-Question Gate before reporting.

Updated May 31, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/grivera82/pi-bughunter --skill triage-validation-grivera82
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: triage-validation
Source: https://github.com/grivera82/pi-bughunter/tree/main/skills/triage-validation
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/grivera82/pi-bughunter --skill triage-validation-grivera82

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

The triage-validation skill enforces a disciplined gate to prevent submitting low-quality or known invalid findings by requiring sequential checks against scope, impact, evidence, and known issues.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Enforces the 7-Question Gate sequence to validate findings before reporting.
  • Provides a structured 4-pre-submission gates to ensure evidence readiness, scope alignment, and deduplication.
  • Helps maintain high-quality submissions by codifying risk assessment and retraction discipline.

Quick Start

Run the gate on a candidate finding to ensure it passes all checks before submission.

Frequently Asked Questions about triage-validation

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I validate security findings before submitting a bug bounty report?

Validating security findings before submission requires applying a structured 7-Question Gate to check scope, impact, evidence, and known issues. This prevents reporting low-quality or duplicate vulnerabilities by enforcing sequential pre-submission gates.

What is the 7-Question Gate for triaging vulnerability reports?

The 7-Question Gate is a triage validation sequence that evaluates scope alignment, deduplication, and evidence readiness for vulnerability findings. It enforces Gate zero to control the workflow, followed by four pre-submission gates and report-quality criteria.

How do I prevent duplicate submissions in bug bounty engagements?

Preventing duplicate submissions involves running findings through triage validation gates that enforce deduplication checks against known issues. Applying these pre-submission gates ensures evidence readiness and scope alignment before reporting vulnerabilities.

What's the best way to ensure evidence hygiene in security engagement workflows?

Ensuring evidence hygiene in security engagements requires codifying risk assessment and retraction discipline through structured validation gates. Applying the 7-Question Gate sequence maintains high-quality submissions by consistently evaluating evidence readiness before reporting.

Does triage validation work for both internal security engagements and bug bounty workflows?

Triage validation works across both internal security engagements and bug bounty workflows by applying a consistent 7-Question Gate. It enforces sequential checks against scope, impact, evidence, and known issues to validate findings before reporting.

When should I not use a structured validation gate for vulnerability findings?

A structured validation gate may add unnecessary overhead for trivial, already-confirmed vulnerabilities requiring immediate reporting. However, skipping the 7-Question Gate risks submitting low-quality findings, duplicates, or out-of-scope issues during triage.