triage-validation

Validate offensive security findings against scope, reproducibility, and impact requirements.

1.1k|191|Updated Jun 24, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/uphiago/recon-skills --skill triage-validation-uphiago
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: triage-validation
Source: https://github.com/uphiago/recon-skills/tree/main/redteam/triage-validation
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/uphiago/recon-skills --skill triage-validation-uphiago

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Bug bounty researchers frequently waste time and damage their reputation and payout potential by submitting findings that fail program scope checks, lack proven real-world impact, or are already publicly known issues. This Skill eliminates that waste by enforcing strict, structured validation gates before any report is drafted, ensuring only high-quality, actionable findings are submitted.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • 7-Question Gate: A step-by-step checklist that kills invalid findings immediately if any answer fails, covering exploitability, scope alignment, impact tangibility, and uniqueness.
  • Pre-Submission Validation: 4 sequential time-boxed gates that confirm the bug is real, in scope, reproducible from scratch, and has concrete impact before report writing begins.
  • Reference Libraries: Built-in never-submit lists of low-value findings, CVSS 3.1 quick reference tables, conditionally valid bug chain requirements, and retraction discipline templates to avoid common costly reporting mistakes.
  • Use Case: A researcher finds a potential open redirect, runs the 7-Question Gate, sees it requires a chain to OAuth redirect_uri theft to be valid, builds and tests the full chain end-to-end before submitting a high-severity finding instead of a low-value standalone report that would be rejected as informative.

Quick Start

Use the triage-validation skill to run the 7-Question Gate on your potential bug bounty finding before you start drafting any report.

Frequently Asked Questions about triage-validation

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I validate bug bounty findings to avoid false positives before submitting a report?

To validate bug bounty findings and avoid false positives, run a 7-Question Gate to verify exploitability, scope alignment, impact tangibility, and uniqueness. This structured triage checklist eliminates invalid submissions by killing findings that fail any validation gate before report drafting begins.

What is finding triage in penetration testing and vulnerability assessment workflows?

Finding triage in penetration testing is the process of validating offensive security findings against program scope, reproducibility, and tangible impact requirements. It applies structured severity validation guardrails and false positive filtering across web applications, APIs, and cloud-hosted assets to maximize researcher validity ratios.

How do I check if a vulnerability is in scope and reproducible for a bug bounty program?

To check if a vulnerability is in scope and reproducible, apply sequential time-boxed validation gates that confirm the bug is real, within program scope, reproducible from scratch, and has concrete impact. This pre-submission validation ensures only actionable findings pass triage.

When should I not submit a standalone open redirect finding during bug bounty triage?

You should not submit a standalone open redirect finding if it lacks tangible impact without a bug chain. During triage validation, check if it requires a chain to OAuth redirect_uri theft to be valid, then build and test the full chain end-to-end to submit a high-severity finding instead of a rejected informative report.

Does CVSS scoring help with false positive filtering in vulnerability assessment reports?

CVSS scoring helps false positive filtering by providing a quick reference table to standardize severity validation during finding triage. Combined with never-submit lists for low-value findings and conditionally valid bug chain requirements, it enforces strict validation guardrails to reduce triager rejection rates.

What is the best way to handle out-of-scope or duplicate bug bounty submissions?

The best way to handle out-of-scope or duplicate bug bounty submissions is to enforce strict validation gates and consult built-in never-submit reference libraries before drafting. Applying retraction discipline templates and pre-submission validation ensures you avoid common costly reporting mistakes and maintain payout validity.