tribunal

Evaluate code changes against domain-specific checklists and produce structured verdicts.

67|10|Updated Apr 12, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/GadaaLabs/claude-code-on-steroids --skill tribunal-gadaalabs
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: tribunal
Source: https://github.com/GadaaLabs/claude-code-on-steroids/tree/main/skills/tribunal
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/GadaaLabs/claude-code-on-steroids --skill tribunal-gadaalabs

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

In environments with rapid iteration, reviews can become inconsistent and delayed. Tribunal addresses this by delivering formal, evidence-based verdicts to guide decisions before merging.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Domain-aware review scope selection ensures the appropriate checklist is applied for ML / AI / Embedded / Frontend / Security tasks.
  • Structured verdicts with rationale provide clear acceptance criteria and actionable remediation steps.
  • Context-aware reviewer prompts and guidance tailor the review with relevant code context and safety constraints.
  • Use Case: pre-merge verification of major features and post-task quality checks to maintain project standards.

Quick Start

Request tribunal review after completing a task to obtain a structured verdict.

Frequently Asked Questions about tribunal

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate domain-aware code reviews before merging?

Automated pre-merge code review applies domain-specific checklists to evaluate changes and deliver structured verdicts. It ensures formal, evidence-based quality checks before integration.

What is the best way to ensure quality across ML, AI, and Embedded code changes?

The best way to ensure quality across ML, AI, and Embedded domains is applying domain-aware review scope selection. This enforces the appropriate checklist for each specific task and provides traceable feedback.

Can I get structured verdicts with actionable remediation for frontend tasks?

Yes, you can get structured verdicts with rationale for frontend tasks. The review evaluates changes against a formal checklist, providing clear acceptance criteria and actionable remediation steps tailored to the frontend domain.

How do I generate context-aware reviewer prompts for security code changes?

Context-aware reviewer prompts are generated by evaluating security code changes against a formal checklist. The system tailors the review with relevant code context and safety constraints to guide the reviewer.

When do I need evidence-based code review decisions in a production workflow?

Evidence-based code review decisions are needed after each task, feature completion, or before merge in production workflows. They address inconsistent and delayed reviews by delivering formal verdicts to guide integration decisions.