trio:subsprint-sync

Resolves post-subsprint TC sync and dispatches trio:tc-management for updates.

5|Updated Apr 26, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/10XTeams/trio --skill trio-subsprint-sync
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: trio:subsprint-sync
Source: https://github.com/10XTeams/trio/tree/main/src-plugin/skills/trio%3Asubsprint-sync
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/10XTeams/trio --skill trio-subsprint-sync

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

After a subsprint lands code and docs via the runner, this skill handles the remaining synchronization by updating test cases according to the plan's TC impact. It resolves the plan, detects applicability, and dispatches trio:tc-management, letting that tool flip the Update Test Case checkbox.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Resolve plan and determine TC impact applicability.
  • Dispatch trio:tc-management to patch or audit test cases.
  • Do not modify code/docs directly; acts as a coordination layer.
  • Generate a clean execution record and rely on the tc-management step to finalize changes.

Quick Start

After the subsprint runner finishes, run trio:subsprint-sync to push the TC updates for the plan.

Frequently Asked Questions about trio:subsprint-sync

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I automate test case synchronization after a subsprint lands code changes?

Test case synchronization after a subsprint is automated by resolving the plan, detecting TC impact applicability, and dispatching a management action to patch or audit test cases. The coordination layer performs preflight validations and generates a clean execution record without modifying code or docs directly.

What is the best way to orchestrate post-subsprint TC updates without manual intervention?

Orchestrating post-subsprint TC updates hands-off is achieved by resolving the plan and dispatching a management tool to finalize changes. This coordination layer determines eligibility, applies safety validations, and relies on the downstream management step to flip the Update Test Case checkbox.

Why does my test case management workflow require a separate coordination step after the runner finishes?

A separate coordination step is required because the runner lands code and docs but does not patch test cases. The synchronization step resolves the plan, detects TC impact applicability, and dispatches the management action to handle the remaining updates safely.

Can I use this orchestration workflow to directly modify code and documentation after a sprint?

This orchestration workflow cannot directly modify code or documentation after a sprint. It acts strictly as a coordination layer that resolves plans, determines TC impact eligibility, and dispatches a management tool to finalize test case updates.

Do I need a dedicated test case management tool to handle updates triggered by subsprint synchronization?

A dedicated test case management tool is required because the synchronization step only resolves and dispatches actions. It relies on a downstream management component to perform the actual patching, auditing, and checkbox updates for the test cases.

What limitations exist when automating TC impact audits as part of a sprint workflow?

Limitations include the inability to flip checkboxes or modify code directly, meaning automation is constrained to resolving plans and dispatching management actions. The workflow depends entirely on the downstream management tool to produce final results and finalize changes.