TRIP-3-review

Enforce code quality and architectural compliance through structured reviews.

597|88|Updated Jan 28, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/PiLastDigit/TRIP-workflow --skill trip-3-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: TRIP-3-review
Source: https://github.com/PiLastDigit/TRIP-workflow/tree/main/skills/TRIP-3-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/PiLastDigit/TRIP-workflow --skill trip-3-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Manual code reviews are slow and error-prone; TRIP-3-review provides a structured, repeatable review workflow that enforces project standards and architectural alignment.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Systematic Review Checklist covering functional requirements, code quality, architectural compliance, error handling, and security.
  • Issue Severity Classification with defined severities and a post-review documentation process to guide remediation.
  • Completion Criteria and Post-Review Deliverables: ARCHI.md verification, docs/3-code-review/ summary file generation.

Quick Start

Run the TRIP-3-review workflow on your codebase and follow the checklist to complete the review.

Frequently Asked Questions about TRIP-3-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I enforce architectural compliance during a code review?

To enforce architectural compliance during a code review, apply a structured checklist verifying functional requirements, code quality, error handling, and security against ARCHI.md patterns to ensure project standards alignment.

What is the best way to speed up code reviews without skipping quality checks?

The best way to speed up code reviews while maintaining quality is using a systematic review checklist that classifies issue severities and generates a post-review summary file to guide remediation.

Can I use a structured review checklist for software projects across different programming languages?

Yes, you can apply this structured review checklist to software projects across languages, focusing on reviewing functional requirements, quality, architecture, error handling, and security uniformly.

How do I document code review results for a release cycle?

To document code review results for a release cycle, generate a post-review summary file in the docs/3-code-review/ directory after verifying ARCHI.md compliance and classifying issue severities.

What does a systematic code review checklist cover for error handling and security?

A systematic code review checklist covers error handling and security by evaluating functional requirements, architectural compliance, and issue severity classification to produce structured post-review deliverables.

When do I need to verify ARCHI.md patterns in my codebase?

You need to verify ARCHI.md patterns in your codebase during the release cycle's code review phase to enforce architectural compliance and document any deviations in the post-review summary file.