triton-ascend-case-elemwise-broadcast-3d

Optimize cross-axis 3D tensor broadcast with a two-stage kernel strategy.

6|1|Updated Apr 19, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/xchang1121/AutoResearch-CC-hook --skill triton-ascend-case-elemwise-broadcast-3d
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: triton-ascend-case-elemwise-broadcast-3d
Source: https://github.com/xchang1121/AutoResearch-CC-hook/tree/main/skills/triton-ascend/cases/triton-ascend-case-elemwise-broadcast-3d
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/xchang1121/AutoResearch-CC-hook --skill triton-ascend-case-elemwise-broadcast-3d

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill targets performance improvements for cross-axis 3D broadcast by employing a two-stage kernel strategy, unlocking better vectorization and parallelism.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Two-stage kernel approach: first broadcast expansion and reshape to 2D, then a second kernel operates on the flattened dimension for high throughput.
  • Performance uplift: especially effective when the last dimension is very small, improving utilization of hardware cores.
  • Use Case: accelerate 3D broadcast operations on tensors with shapes like (B, H, W) and (1, H, 1).

Quick Start

Run the two-stage kernel workflow on a 3D broadcast task to observe improved throughput.

Frequently Asked Questions about triton-ascend-case-elemwise-broadcast-3d

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I optimize 3D broadcast performance when the last tensor dimension is very small?

To optimize 3D broadcast performance for small last dimensions, use a two-stage kernel strategy that first broadcasts and reshapes to 2D, then runs a second kernel on the flattened dimension to maximize hardware vectorization and parallelism.

What is the best way to handle cross-axis 3D broadcast on Ascend hardware?

Handling cross-axis 3D broadcast on Ascend hardware is best achieved using a two-stage Triton kernel approach that reshapes tensors to 2D before executing a high throughput kernel on the collapsed dimension.

Why does my 3D elementwise broadcast operation have low hardware core utilization?

3D elementwise broadcast operations often have low hardware core utilization when the last dimension is tiny, but applying a staged kernel workflow that flattens the dimension first significantly improves throughput and vectorization.

Can I use Triton kernels to accelerate broadcast operations on tensors with shapes like (B, H, W) and (1, H, 1)?

Yes, you can use Triton kernels to accelerate broadcast operations on tensors with shapes like (B, H, W) and (1, H, 1) by employing a two-stage strategy that reshapes the data to 2D before running the final elementwise computation.

When should I use a two-stage kernel strategy instead of a single broadcast kernel?

You should use a two-stage kernel strategy instead of a single broadcast kernel when dealing with large 3D tensors with a tiny last dimension, as the reshape and flatten workflow unlocks better parallelism and vectorization for high throughput.