triz-engineering-solver

To resolve engineering contradictions using TRIZ, map your improving and worsening parameters through the 39 Engineering Parameters and the Contradiction Matrix to generate 3 to 5 actionable inventive concepts with ideality scores.

Technical contradictions involve trade-offs between two parameters, while physical contradictions require a single parameter to have opposing states. The solver applies separation principles for physical contradictions and the 40 Inventive Principles for technical ones.

Use Su-Field analysis to model interactions between substances and fields, then apply ARIZ as a deep-dive workflow for complex contradictions. This systematic approach yields resource-aware concepts that minimize new parts.

Yes, the solver emphasizes resource-aware concepts by leveraging internal, external, and temporal resources to increase ideality. It outputs solutions with explicit ideality scores to validate that new parts are minimized.

The best way to generate inventive concepts with ideality scores is to frame your problem as an Ideal Final Result and let the deterministic workflow output machine-readable templates. This replaces guesswork with structured TRIZ validation.

You should avoid using the Contradiction Matrix when the problem cannot be framed as a trade-off between specific improving and worsening parameters. Instead, shift to Su-Field analysis or the ARIZ deep-dive for unparameterized physical contradictions.