trust

Generate felt-experience explanations of trust using scenario-based tests.

1|Updated Apr 1, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/wojons/je-ne-sais-quoi --skill trust
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: trust
Source: https://github.com/wojons/je-ne-sais-quoi/tree/main/skills/trust
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/wojons/je-ne-sais-quoi --skill trust

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires je-ne-sais-quoi.

What problem does it solve?

It helps you describe and generate the felt experience of trust—especially the asymmetry of how trust is built slowly and broken fast—so responses feel human instead of merely game-theoretic or clinically correct.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Felt-vs-logical framing: contrasts hollow “prediction/probability” explanations with embodied, inside-the-experience explanations.
  • Situation-based tests: uses concrete scenarios (like the knife, the confession, the returned wallet) to determine whether an answer truly understands trust as lived risk.
  • Failure mode detection: defines what an inauthentic answer sounds like, so the model can self-correct toward the “bridge/knife/hand-on-the-back” texture.

Quick Start

Use the trust skill to rewrite an explanation you are generating so it includes the knife/bridge/hand imagery and a felt consequence analysis for one specific scenario.

Frequently Asked Questions about trust

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I make AI relationship analysis feel human instead of just game-theoretic?

Scenario testing for trust uses concrete situations like the knife, the confession, or the returned wallet. These scenarios test whether an answer truly understands trust as lived risk rather than relying on rational probability models alone.

How do I rewrite a generated explanation to include the felt experience of trust?

Authentic trust descriptions use inside-the-experience language and avoid hollow prediction or probability explanations. They contrast rational models with embodied explanations, demonstrating self-correction toward the bridge or knife texture when failure modes are detected.

Do I need the je-ne-sais-quoi skill to use this relationship dynamics approach?

Yes, you need the je-ne-sais-quoi skill as a required dependency. It provides the foundational felt-concept processing that this skill builds upon to generate embodied, inside-the-experience trust narratives for safety-critical decision analysis.

When should I avoid using felt-experience framing for trust and vulnerability?

Avoid felt-experience framing when you need purely rational, game-theoretic models for safety-critical decisions. This approach is specifically designed for scenarios where rational models alone feel hollow and require embodied, inside-the-experience language.