trust-calibration

Signal confidence, sources, and alternatives in AI outputs.

157|33|Updated Mar 9, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/Owl-Listener/ai-design-skills --skill trust-calibration-owl-listener
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: trust-calibration
Source: https://github.com/Owl-Listener/ai-design-skills/tree/main/claude-plugin/ai-alignment-reasoning/skills/trust-calibration
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/Owl-Listener/ai-design-skills --skill trust-calibration-owl-listener

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

Calibrates user trust in AI outputs by signaling confidence, sources, and potential alternatives to prevent overtrust and undertrust.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Confidence signaling: explicit language indicating epistemic state to help users decide when to trust the answer.
  • Source attribution and alternatives: cite sources and surface alternative interpretations to improve transparency.
  • Failure transparency: reveal past corrections and how the model would handle uncertainties.
  • Use Case: In design reviews or product decisions, present reasoning and sources so humans can verify critical steps.

Quick Start

Provide the model with a user query and request explicit confidence, sources, and alternatives in each answer.

Frequently Asked Questions about trust-calibration

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I calibrate user trust in AI outputs during decision-support tasks?

You can calibrate user trust by applying confidence signaling, source attribution, and explicit hedging rules. This involves using language like "I don't know" or "According to X" to reveal AI limitations and provenance, preventing both overtrust and undertrust.

What is confidence signaling in human-AI interaction?

Confidence signaling in human-AI interaction is the practice of using explicit language to indicate an AI's epistemic state. It helps users decide when to trust an answer by presenting alternatives and transparently revealing past corrections and uncertainties.

How to design guidelines for transparent source attribution in AI responses?

To design transparent source attribution guidelines, establish rules for citing sources and surfacing alternative interpretations. This improves transparency by showing provenance, allowing users to verify critical steps during product decisions or design reviews.

When do I need failure transparency for AI-generated explanations?

You need failure transparency for AI-generated explanations when users must understand model uncertainties and handle edge cases. It prevents overtrust by revealing past corrections and how the model behaves when it lacks sufficient information.

What's the best way to prevent overtrust and undertrust in AI decision-support systems?

The best way to prevent overtrust and undertrust is to present reasoning alongside sources and explicit confidence levels. By utilizing alternative interpretations and explicit hedging rules, users can independently verify critical steps and limitations.