tui-test

You can automate TUI testing by applying a multi-phase workflow that uses ink-testing-library and vitest to perform gap analysis, generate targeted tests, and iterate through diagnosis cycles. This ensures deterministic execution with mock patterns and keyboard input simulations.

Test generation for ink components involves a phase-driven orchestration workflow where an architect designs tests, an executor runs them, and a verifier checks results. This structured cycle targets specific components and hooks to iteratively improve test coverage and reliability.

Yes, ink-testing-library supports keyboard input simulations within deterministic test execution cycles. By integrating mock patterns, you can reliably simulate and validate user interactions across TUI components without flaky behavior.

Yes, the workflow supports both targeted testing for specific modules and full-suite regression testing. It applies deterministic execution with mock patterns across all components, hooks, and animation modules to ensure comprehensive coverage and reliability.

The best way to perform gap analysis is using a structured workflow that evaluates existing test coverage across all components and hooks, identifies untested paths, and generates ink-testing-library and vitest tests to fill those gaps through iterative diagnosis and fixes.

Non-deterministic tests often fail due to missing mock patterns or improper keyboard input simulations. Applying a phase-driven orchestration workflow with deterministic execution cycles and mock patterns ensures reliable test runs and iterative diagnosis of failures.