two-claude-review

Generate implementation plans and skeptical staff-engineer reviews.

1|Updated Nov 10, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/eci-global/80HD --skill two-claude-review
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: two-claude-review
Source: https://github.com/eci-global/80HD/tree/main/.claude/skills/two-claude-review
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/eci-global/80HD --skill two-claude-review

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill requires git, tmux, claude, and includes scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

The Two-Claude pattern provides a reviewer subagent to critically evaluate implementation plans, helping uncover gaps, ambiguities, and risky assumptions early.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Structured plan creation: Claude A writes a complete plan with requirements and constraints.
  • Skeptical review: A reviewer subagent assesses the plan as a staff engineer, challenging decisions and proposing safer alternatives.
  • Iterative refinement: Plans are revised based on feedback until ready for implementation.

Quick Start

  1. Write a detailed plan in the planning worktree.
  2. Request a reviewer review using the staff-engineer prompt.
  3. Iterate with revisions until the plan is solid.

Frequently Asked Questions about two-claude-review

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I get a skeptical staff-engineer review of my implementation plan?

To get a skeptical staff-engineer review of your implementation plan, this skill uses a two-Claude pattern where Claude A generates the plan and Claude B critiques it as a reviewer subagent. It challenges architectural decisions and proposes safer alternatives to uncover gaps early.

What is the two-Claude pattern for architectural planning?

The two-Claude pattern for architectural planning is a process where one Claude instance writes a complete plan with requirements and constraints, while a second reviewer subagent applies a staff-engineer prompt to critically evaluate edge-cases and risky assumptions before implementation.

How do I find gaps and risky assumptions in a complex feature plan?

You find gaps and risky assumptions by generating a plan with Claude A and requesting a reviewer assessment using the staff-engineer prompt provided by the skill. This iterative refinement continues with revisions until the architectural plan is solid and ready for implementation.

Do I need git and tmux to use this Claude review workflow?

Yes, you need git and tmux to use this Claude review workflow, as the skill dependencies include git, tmux, and claude to manage the planning worktree and execute the structured plan creation and reviewer subagent phases.

When should I use a reviewer subagent for multi-phase initiatives?

You should use a reviewer subagent for multi-phase initiatives when early risk identification and rigorous critique are essential. It is specifically designed for complex features and architectural decisions where unverified assumptions carry high implementation risk.