ubergoal

Own the goal lifecycle with tier classification, planning, review, and acceptance proof.

Updated Apr 30, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/rdleclerc/agentic-uber-skills --skill ubergoal
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ubergoal
Source: https://github.com/rdleclerc/agentic-uber-skills/tree/main/ubergoal
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/rdleclerc/agentic-uber-skills --skill ubergoal

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes references (resource) and scripts (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

Ubergoal removes ambiguity and missing evidence in substantial agentic coding work by making the goal owner accountable for tiering, routing, review-board coordination, acceptance proof, and post-run learning.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Goal-owning lifecycle wrapper: classifies risk tier, creates/binds a platform goal when available, and routes to the right subskills instead of monolith planning.
  • Expectation/surprise gating: performs a user expectation vs surprise assessment early and re-checks during final readiness.
  • Rigorous planning and bounded execution: routes planning to uberplan, coordinates specialist review-board lanes for Tier 2+, and enforces child-by-child operational outcome discipline.
  • Failure-aware adaptation loop: stops and triggers RCA + scope correction when repeated or material unexpected test failures appear, rather than blindly patching.
  • Evidence-first completion: routes final proof to uberaccept, prevents completion without policy-adherence checks, surprise delta reporting, and an Uber run receipt.
  • Learning and skill evolution: hands off what actually worked (and what didn’t) to uberskillevolver.

Quick Start

Use the ubergoal skill when you have substantial coding or agentic-system work that needs safe tiering, specialist review-board lanes, rigorous planning, and evidence-backed final acceptance.

Frequently Asked Questions about ubergoal

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I manage risk tiering for multi-agent coding workflows?

Risk tiering for multi-agent coding workflows is managed by classifying tasks into operational tiers, routing Tier 2+ scenarios to specialist review-board lanes, and enforcing child-by-child execution discipline to ensure safe delivery.

What is the best way to coordinate long-running agentic coding tasks safely?

Long-running agentic coding tasks are coordinated safely through a goal-owning lifecycle wrapper that handles tier classification, bounded execution, and evidence-based routing to ensure rigorous planning and final acceptance proof.

How do I handle repeated unexpected test failures in automated coding pipelines?

Repeated unexpected test failures trigger a failure-aware adaptation loop that stops execution, initiates root cause analysis, and applies scope correction rather than blindly patching the code.

How do I generate evidence receipts for agentic system acceptance?

Evidence receipts for agentic system acceptance are generated by enforcing policy-adherence checks, reporting expectation versus surprise deltas, and capturing a final Uber run receipt before allowing task completion.

When do I need specialist review-board lanes for coding lifecycle routing?

Specialist review-board lanes are needed when coding lifecycle routing identifies work as Tier 2 or higher, requiring rigorous planning, multi-agent coordination, and bounded execution oversight.

Can I use plan routing for agentic workflows without a platform goal dependency?

Plan routing for agentic workflows can operate by creating or binding a platform goal when available, but still enforces expectation gating, planning, and acceptance proof even without a native platform integration.