ui-flow

Coordinate UI changes across views and styles with browser QA evidence.

44|8|Updated Jul 14, 2025
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/thegeronimo/hyperopen --skill ui-flow
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ui-flow
Source: https://github.com/thegeronimo/hyperopen/tree/main/.agents/skills/ui-flow
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/thegeronimo/hyperopen --skill ui-flow

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

UI teams often struggle to coordinate UI changes with browser QA, design validation, and implementation review, causing misaligned visuals and delayed delivery.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Govern UI changes across views and styles with explicit QA and design governance.
  • Evidence-driven workflow that captures browser QA results, exec plans, and review signoffs.
  • Cross-module coordination for frontend components under /hyperopen/src/hyperopen/views/** and /hyperopen/src/styles/**.

Quick Start

Invoke ui-flow to coordinate a UI change with browser QA evidence and design validation.

Frequently Asked Questions about ui-flow

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I coordinate frontend UI changes with browser QA and design validation?

Coordinate frontend UI changes by applying governance workflows to views and styles directories, requiring explicit browser QA evidence and an active ExecPlan before implementation review sign-off.

What is the best way to govern UI changes across views and styles to ensure design fidelity?

Govern UI changes by enforcing deterministic guidance and strict guardrails across frontend interaction flows, capturing browser QA results and exec plans to validate design fidelity before delivery.

How does evidence-driven UI review work for frontend interaction flows?

Evidence-driven UI review works by requiring explicit browser QA evidence and an active ExecPlan before sign-off, ensuring deterministic guidance and strict guardrails are satisfied for all UI changes.

Can I use this workflow to validate UI changes in specific frontend directories?

You can validate UI changes in specific frontend directories, specifically targeting interaction flows under /hyperopen/src/hyperopen/views/** and /hyperopen/src/styles/** for cross-module coordination and governance.

Do I need an active ExecPlan to get sign-off on UI changes?

You need an active ExecPlan to get sign-off on UI changes, as the workflow requires explicit browser QA evidence and an active ExecPlan before allowing implementation review sign-off.

Why does UI delivery get delayed when coordinating design validation and browser QA?

UI delivery gets delayed when teams lack coordinated governance across views and styles, causing misaligned visuals and unverified browser QA coverage that an evidence-driven workflow with strict guardrails prevents.