ui-review

Automated visual regression testing captures screenshots of your application's UI elements and compares them against established visual standards to detect inconsistencies. This ensures new features adhere to project design guidelines before they are merged into the main codebase.

A UI review workflow systematically evaluates application interfaces by capturing screenshots and structural snapshots, then comparing them against visual standards. It catches visual regressions by identifying deviations from the design baseline before code deployment.

Yes, you need a provisioned Eyes environment to run automated visual consistency checks. The review process also requires a ui-test-plan.md file to define the parameters and standards for evaluating the application's interface.

Yes, you can perform a screenshot comparison for a specific feature by running the review process with the feature's spec slug. This captures the necessary UI snapshots and compares them against the visual standards defined in your test plan.

Integrating automated UI testing involves triggering a screenshot capture and structural snapshot review against visual standards before code is merged. This requires configuring the review process to run with the feature's spec slug within your continuous integration workflow.

Visual consistency testing requires a ui-test-plan.md file to define the specific visual standards and elements that the automated review process evaluates. Without this file, the screenshot comparison lacks the baseline criteria needed to detect visual regressions accurately.