unslop

Run the text through the unslop process: scan for the 31 documented patterns, rewrite each instance while preserving meaning, then add voice through opinions, varied sentence rhythm, and specifics. Finish with a self-audit asking what still looks machine-generated.

The highest-signal tells are puffery words like pivotal and testament, em dash overuse, chatbot phrases like I hope this helps, vague attributions like experts believe, and superficial -ing phrases such as highlighting or showcasing.

No. The process explicitly preserves meaning and matches the intended tone. It replaces vague or inflated phrasing with concrete facts and plain words, and cuts sentences that carry no information rather than altering the message.

Removing patterns is only half the job. Sterile, voiceless writing is equally obvious. Add opinions, vary sentence length, use first person where it fits, and replace abstract claims with specific facts or numbers.

Avoid it when strict formal register is required, such as legal or regulatory text where prescribed phrasing matters. The rewrite favors conversational plain speech, active voice, and first person, which may conflict with house style guides.