unslop

Scan the text for known AI tells such as superficial -ing phrases, vague attributions, and chatbot closers, then rewrite each instance with plain direct wording. The rewrite preserves the original meaning and matches the intended tone.

Common signs include words like delve, crucial, and tapestry, forced rule-of-three groupings, em dash and colon overuse, boldface on every noun, sycophantic openers like "Great question!", and generic conclusions like "The future looks bright."

Yes. The rules cover jargon and abstract metaphor nouns common in technical docs, such as substrate, vector, and scaffolding, replacing them with concrete words. It also fixes over-compressed fragments and passive voice typical of generated documentation.

No. The process explicitly preserves meaning and matches the intended tone. It only replaces vague or decorative phrasing with plainer equivalents, deletes filler, and restructures dense sentences for readability.

Avoid applying them when a stylistic choice is deliberate, such as a bold lead-in that names an item and adds genuinely new detail, or passive voice where the actor is unknown. The rules note exceptions for legitimate colon and boldface use.