update-design

To evaluate an ADR for structural completeness and logical consistency, run the evaluation workflow on the target file path to generate a final score and a prioritized improvement list.

The best way to review functional design docs before release is to apply a four-criterion scoring system covering structural completeness, logical consistency, implementability, and coverage, followed by a final consistency check.

You generate actionable improvement tasks for incomplete design documents by running an automated review that identifies gaps and contradictions, outputting a prioritized todo list to address specific issues.

Yes, you can use this design doc review process for plan files across repository teams, as it applies to ADRs, functional design docs, and plan files during post-creation reviews and updates.

The criteria used to score design documents for quality assurance are structural completeness, logical consistency, implementability, and coverage, which together produce a final score and highlight necessary improvements.

You need a structured evaluation for architecture decision records when solving the problem of inconsistent ADRs, ensuring no contradictions or omissions exist before release through a final consistency check.