update

To safely merge upstream updates without overwriting local customizations, you need an auditable workflow that performs a three-way diff and guides conflict resolution. This process preserves user data and per-skill configurations while cleanly applying code and container updates.

Resolving git merge conflicts during a container update requires a three-way diff mechanism that detects conflicts between upstream changes and local edits. Guided prompts then help you safely merge configuration updates and protect user data zones from loss.

A three-way diff protects user data during an upstream merge by comparing the upstream base, new upstream changes, and local edits to identify exact conflicts. This ensures your local customizations are preserved while cleanly integrating new code and configuration updates.

Yes, this upstream merge workflow works directly with containerized environments to apply code updates and configuration merges safely. It protects Green, Yellow, and Red data zones to prevent data loss across all user zones during the update process.

Yes, you can rollback an upstream merge if conflicts cause data loss because the workflow includes safe rollback capabilities alongside guided conflict resolution. This ensures you can revert to a previous state if an update fails or compromises your local customizations.

The limitations of a guided conflict resolution process include requiring user intervention to resolve complex conflicts between upstream changes and local edits. While it provides a robust preflight and three-way diff, manual guidance is still necessary to ensure safe merges across all data zones.