skills.rest
ralvarezdev
ralvarezdevCOMMUNITY
Explore all skills by this author →
WebsiteGitHub

uru-thesis-reviewer

Generate ordered Markdown diffs for URU thesis reviews.

3|Updated Feb 26, 2026
Search Tags:#structured-feedback#citation-check#document-quality#linguistic-editing#thesis-review#uru-norms#markdown-diffs
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/ralvarezdev/ralvaskills --skill uru-thesis-reviewer
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent▼
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: uru-thesis-reviewer
Source: https://github.com/ralvarezdev/ralvaskills/tree/main/skills/personal/uru-thesis-reviewer
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/ralvarezdev/ralvaskills --skill uru-thesis-reviewer

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This Skill provides structured, non-destructive feedback for URU theses by generating ordered Markdown diffs that authors can apply manually to the source document, preserving original formatting and provenance while guiding improvements.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Non-destructive, diff-based reviews that track changes (- old / + new) for each thesis section.
  • Coverage of substance, structure, prose, and citations aligned with NORMAS_URU_2020.
  • Use Case: A student uploads a URU thesis chapter and receives a guided diff set highlighting issues and recommended edits.

Quick Start

Upload a URU thesis docx and request a non-destructive, diff-based review.

Frequently Asked Questions about uru-thesis-reviewer

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I get non-destructive thesis feedback without altering my original document?▼

You can receive non-destructive thesis feedback by generating ordered Markdown diffs that track proposed changes (- old / + new), which you then manually apply to your source document to preserve the original formatting and provenance.

Can I review a thesis chapter for both prose quality and citation formatting?▼

Yes, you can review a thesis chapter for both prose quality and citation formatting simultaneously. The review covers substance, structure, prose, and citations, validating formatting against NORMAS_URU_2020 standards.

What is the best way to review a .docx thesis against URU norms?▼

Upload your .docx thesis and request a diff-based review to validate it against URU norms. This generates section-by-section Markdown diffs that highlight issues and recommended edits aligned with NORMAS_URU_2020.

Does thesis review work with .docx files and Markdown output?▼

Yes, thesis review accepts .docx file uploads and outputs ordered Markdown diffs. This format tracks changes clearly using - old and + new lines, enabling manual application to the source document without automated overwrites.

Why use Markdown diffs instead of direct edits for thesis reviewing?▼

Markdown diffs provide non-destructive, iterative feedback by tracking changes (- old / + new) without altering the source document. This approach preserves original formatting and allows authors to selectively apply recommended edits manually.

Related Skills

Explore More Education & Research Skills→
anyekoutouminganyekoutouming
2

thesis-overnight-marathon

Automate overnight thesis task execution with P0/P1 prioritization and DOCX backups.

Community
Advanced
Aken-TeamsAken-Teams

RAG Knowledge Analyst

Cross-reference conversation files to produce source-cited insights.

Official
Advanced
anyekoutouminganyekoutouming
2

thesis-docx-format-pipeline

Rebuild and finalize thesis DOCX files via a verified txt-to-docx pipeline.

Community
Advanced
BAIZ1DBAIZ1D

citation-management

Extract, validate, and format academic citations into BibTeX entries.

Community
Advanced