using-react-component-pattern

To enforce a consistent React component pattern in TypeScript, require an explicit Props interface named after the component, use named exports, and define components as arrow functions with internal prop destructuring to reduce ambiguity and errors in codebases.

Named exports should be used instead of default exports for React components to enforce consistent component-building patterns, reduce ambiguity during code reviews, and ensure easier refactoring across TypeScript-driven React projects.

To structure React props with an interface, define a component-specific interface with a Props suffix, then destructure the props inside the arrow function body rather than in the function parameters to maintain type-safety and clarity.

Yes, you can review existing React components for props interface naming conventions by auditing them against rules that validate the exact Props suffix naming, named exports, and internal destructuring to ensure consistency in your TypeScript React projects.

The best way to scaffold new TypeScript React components with type-safety is to generate files using an arrow-function definition, a named export, and a dedicated Props interface that follows the exact Props suffix naming convention for clear and consistent code.

Yes, this React component pattern works without default exports by explicitly requiring named exports for all components, avoiding default exports entirely to promote type-safety and consistency across TypeScript React projects.