ux-audit

Audit pages or components with six Krug-inspired usability checks.

42|9|Updated Mar 16, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/drvoss/everything-copilot-cli --skill ux-audit-drvoss
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ux-audit
Source: https://github.com/drvoss/everything-copilot-cli/tree/main/skills/testing/ux-audit
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/drvoss/everything-copilot-cli --skill ux-audit-drvoss

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

A fast, repeatable framework to diagnose why a page or component feels confusing, exposing structural issues in navigation, headings, calls-to-action, and copy so teams know what to fix first.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Six Krug-inspired checks: Trunk Test, 3-Second Scan, Page Area, Happy Talk, Mindless Choice, and Goodwill Reservoir to surface both minor and structural issues.
  • Prioritized findings: Pass/Concern/Fail results per check, hard-fail signals, and a short prioritized list of fixes for engineering or design handoff.
  • Use Cases: Run during design reviews, post-release UX triage when users report confusion, or pre-handoff quality sweeps before frontend implementation.

Quick Start

Run a six-check UX audit of the target page or component and return a short human-readable report with pass/concern/fail outcomes and three prioritized fixes.

Frequently Asked Questions about ux-audit

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I run a usability audit on a page to find what confuses users?

Run a usability audit using a six-check Krug-inspired workflow to evaluate navigation, headings, calls-to-action, and copy. It records pass, concern, or fail for each check and produces a human-readable report with prioritized fixes.

What is a heuristic evaluation for UX and when do I need it?

Heuristic evaluation for UX is a structured review to diagnose structural friction and confusion on a page or component. You need it during design handoffs, post-release user reports, or QA sweeps when navigation or copy feels ambiguous.

How do I prioritize UX fixes after identifying friction on a page?

Prioritize UX fixes by running a structured audit that highlights hard-fail signals across six checks. It generates a concise report with a short prioritized list of fixes for engineering or design handoff.

Can I use a UX audit during pre-handoff quality sweeps before frontend implementation?

Yes, you can use this UX audit during pre-handoff quality sweeps. It applies a six-check Trunk Test and 3-Second Scan workflow to surface minor and structural issues in page areas before frontend implementation.

What is the best way to review UI components for ambiguous calls to action?

The best way to review UI components for ambiguous calls to action is a structured component review applying Krug-inspired checks. It evaluates mindless choices and goodwill reservoirs, returning pass, concern, or fail outcomes per check.

Why does my page feel confusing to users after release?

Your page feels confusing due to structural issues in navigation, headings, calls-to-action, or copy. A six-check UX audit diagnoses this friction by recording pass, concern, or fail outcomes and highlighting hard-fail signals.