ux-auditor

Audits rdst CLI usability across discoverability, consistency, and error handling; outputs bug reports and improvement registry.

Updated Apr 28, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/readysettech/rdst --skill ux-auditor-readysettech
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ux-auditor
Source: https://github.com/readysettech/rdst/tree/main/skills/ux-auditor
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/readysettech/rdst --skill ux-auditor-readysettech

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

The UX auditor identifies usability gaps, inconsistencies, and confusing workflows in a CLI, surfacing actionable bugs to improve the user experience and reduce support friction.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Evaluate discoverability, consistency, error recovery, and help/documentation quality across commands.
  • Generate a structured bug filing workflow, including reproducible steps, expected vs actual behavior, and recommended fixes.
  • Produce a global risk and improvement report, plus a known-inconsistencies registry for engineering teams.

Quick Start

Run the UX auditor on the rdst CLI to begin a comprehensive user experience review and bug filing workflow.

Frequently Asked Questions about ux-auditor

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
What is a CLI UX audit and how does it find usability gaps in command-line interfaces?

A CLI UX audit evaluates command discoverability, consistency, error recovery, and help text quality to surface usability gaps. It produces actionable bugs and a formal audit report to reduce support friction and improve the user experience.

How do I audit CLI discoverability and error handling to file actionable bugs?

You audit CLI discoverability and error handling by evaluating commands and help pages for inconsistencies. This generates a structured bug filing workflow with reproducible steps, expected versus actual behavior, and recommended fixes.

Can I generate a known-inconsistencies registry for engineering teams from a CLI usability review?

Yes, a CLI usability review generates a known-inconsistencies registry for engineering teams. It provides structured artifacts including remediation guidance and integration-ready notes for bug trackers to streamline development.

What's the best way to document UX improvements for a command-line tool?

The best way to document UX improvements is to produce a global risk and improvement report. This applies findings across commands and help pages to create actionable bugs and formal audit documentation.

Does a CLI UX audit require any dependencies or specific environment setup to run?

No, the CLI UX audit operates autonomously without requiring external dependencies. It directly analyzes the target CLI's commands, help documentation, and error handling to generate structured remediation artifacts.

When should I not rely on an autonomous UX audit for CLI bug filing?

An autonomous UX audit should not be the sole resource when resolving complex runtime logic bugs requiring live debugging. It focuses on discoverability, consistency, and error handling documentation rather than deep functional code testing.