What problem does it solve?
Deciding how to design a feature without knowing how leading apps handle it leads to guesswork. This Skill synthesizes multiple UX pattern libraries into an opinionated comparison document that identifies conventions, tradeoffs, and gaps.
Core Features & Use Cases
- Cross-App Pattern Analysis: Reads 2+ pattern-library.md files produced by ux-extract and walks them category by category to identify convergence, divergence, unique approaches, and absences.
- Opinionated Recommendations: Produces safe defaults, deliberate-choice tradeoffs, patterns to avoid, and gaps worth filling for a new or existing build.
- Staleness and Coverage Tracking: Flags stale extracts and coverage gaps so recommendations are honestly qualified.
- Use Case: Before building a billing page, compare how claude.ai, Linear, Notion, and Superhuman handle empty states and destructive actions, then receive a decision-ready document with cited sources.
Quick Start
Ask Claude to compare UX patterns across your extracted reference apps, for example by saying "compare how these apps handle empty states".