ux-evaluate

Compare a design system against category benchmarks to produce a structured gap analysis.

25|7|Updated Mar 16, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/xoai/sage --skill ux-evaluate
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: ux-evaluate
Source: https://github.com/xoai/sage/tree/main/skills/ux-evaluate
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/xoai/sage --skill ux-evaluate

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

💡 This Skill includes scripts (resource) and references (resource) components.

What problem does it solve?

This Skill helps ensure that design changes are grounded in evidence by systematically comparing a current design system against established category benchmarks, preventing superficial redesigns and identifying critical areas for improvement.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Gap Analysis: Compares design elements (colors, typography, layout, components, IA) against industry standards.
  • Classification Framework: Categorizes elements as MUST KEEP, SHOULD KEEP, MAY CHANGE, or SHOULD IMPROVE.
  • Prioritized Improvements: Ranks necessary changes based on impact (conversion, accessibility, performance).
  • Use Case: After auditing an existing e-commerce site and researching competitor layouts, use this skill to generate a structured report detailing exactly which elements need updating to meet user expectations and improve conversion rates.

Quick Start

Use the ux-evaluate skill to compare the current design system against category benchmarks for the homepage.

Frequently Asked Questions about ux-evaluate

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I perform a design gap analysis against industry benchmarks?

A design gap analysis compares your current design system elements against industry benchmarks. It classifies colors, typography, layout, and components as MUST keep, SHOULD keep, MAY change, or SHOULD improve based on brand identity and category conventions.

What is the best way to prioritize UX redesign improvements?

The best way to prioritize UX redesign improvements is by ranking necessary changes based on their impact on conversion, accessibility, and performance. This structured evaluation prevents superficial redesigns by grounding changes in evidence from category benchmarks and gap analysis.

How do I evaluate if I should keep or change existing design system components?

To evaluate design system components, compare them against category benchmarks using a classification framework. Elements are categorized as MUST keep, SHOULD keep, MAY change, or SHOULD improve based on brand identity, working patterns, and style updates.

Do I need UX research and audit data before evaluating a design system?

Yes, evaluating a design system against category benchmarks requires inputs from ux-audit and ux-research skills to inform the process. These inputs provide the evidence needed to classify design elements and identify critical areas for improvement accurately.

Can I use category benchmarking to improve e-commerce conversion rates?

Yes, category benchmarking compares your e-commerce design system against industry standards to generate a structured report. This report details exactly which elements need updating to meet user expectations, address accessibility gaps, and improve conversion rates.