Evaluate UX/UI designs against a 168-principle taxonomy with cited findings.
npx skills add https://github.com/kernex-dev/kernex-agent --skill uxui-evaluator
Please help me install this Agent Skill. Skill: uxui-evaluator Source: https://github.com/kernex-dev/kernex-agent/tree/main/deploy/skills/uxui-evaluator Command: npx skills add https://github.com/kernex-dev/kernex-agent --skill uxui-evaluator
UX teams often spend excessive time surfacing and prioritizing design issues across interfaces. This skill provides an evidence-backed evaluation against a comprehensive 168-principle taxonomy to identify concrete UX flaws with citations that support business impact.
Provide a UI design or mockups for evaluation and receive a structured audit report with cited principles and severity levels.
High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.
To conduct a UX design audit, provide your UI mockups for evaluation to generate a structured report with severity-graded findings and cited principles. This surfaces concrete flaws to guide iterative improvements before rollout.
A 168-principle taxonomy in UX/UI evaluation is a comprehensive framework covering cognition, core heuristics, design systems, interface patterns, specialized domains, and accessibility. It surfaces actionable interface issues with evidence-backed citations.
You quantify the business impact of usability and accessibility issues by applying an evaluation framework that requires every finding to cite a principle code and a quantified business impact. This ensures recommendations are actionable.
Yes, you can use heuristic evaluation for both design systems and interface patterns. The evaluation applies a comprehensive taxonomy across these domains, along with cognition and accessibility, to surface cited design issues.
The best way to prioritize UI design issues is to evaluate interfaces against a principle taxonomy that generates severity-graded findings. Every issue includes a principle code citation and a quantified business impact to guide actionable prioritization.
You should avoid using a comprehensive 168-principle taxonomy for a design review if you lack UI mockups to evaluate or need a quick, informal check rather than a rigorous, evidence-backed audit with quantified business impact.
anonymouswhite07Evaluate digital interfaces against 168 UX/UI principles to identify compliance gaps.
heyparth1Audit interface quality across accessibility, performance, theming, and responsive design.
lagarcessAudit Apple platform apps against Human Interface Guidelines with automated checks.
eusouwillnunesValidate agent-produced checklists against predefined QA criteria with pass/fail results.
