v14-coding-core

Guides bounded code patches, debugging, and review with explicit verification and scope discipline.

Updated May 22, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/handaeho/Harness_Engineering --skill v14-coding-core-handaeho
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: v14-coding-core
Source: https://github.com/handaeho/Harness_Engineering/tree/main/prompt-stack/_legacy/_cold_storage/legacy_older_versions/v14/codex/skills/v14-coding-core
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/handaeho/Harness_Engineering --skill v14-coding-core-handaeho

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Coding agents often overreach: they rewrite entire files for a local bug, claim fixes are "done" without running validation, or silently change shared interfaces. This Skill enforces bounded patch discipline, diff-first behavior, and honest separation between what was checked and what remains unverified. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Bounded Patch Policy: Isolates the smallest responsible unit, applies minimal diffs, and blocks repo-wide cleanup disguised as a fix. - Structured Debugging Loop: Follows a symptom-to-cause-to-fix-to-verification structure, ranking candidate causes by evidence fit before changing code. - Verification Matrix & Honest Reporting: Checks local plausibility, behavioral fit, integration fit, and repo-safe posture, then reports what was checked versus what remains unverified. - Use Case: A user reports a failing function in a service module. The Skill reads only the active slice, proposes a narrow patch, runs the smallest meaningful validation, and summarizes the change with explicit unresolved integration risks. ## Quick Start Use the v14-coding-core skill to debug this traceback and produce a minimal patch with a verification checklist.

Frequently Asked Questions about v14-coding-core

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I make an AI coding agent produce minimal patches instead of rewrites?

Apply a bounded patch policy that isolates the smallest responsible unit, preserves public contracts, and forbids broad cleanup under the same diff. Full rewrites are allowed only when the unit is structurally unsalvageable or the user explicitly requests replacement.

How to structure AI-assisted debugging from symptom to verified fix?

Use the sequence: observed symptom, candidate causes, most likely cause, fix strategy, verification. Separate observed facts from inferred causes, rank competing causes by evidence fit, and prefer reversible tests before irreversible changes.

When should a coding skill not be used for a task?

Skip it for document-grounded research, architecture comparison, evaluation or release-gate operations, and tiny non-code factual replies. It is designed for tasks where the active slice is code and local correctness matters most.

Why does an AI claim code is fixed when it never ran the tests?

Agents often overstate results without a verification contract. This Skill forbids words like "fixed" or "done" unless the solved condition is justified, and requires reporting what was checked, what remains unverified, and the safest next validation step.

What are the limits of local validation for code changes?

Local syntax or type plausibility does not prove integration safety. The Skill requires stating unresolved downstream risk, surfacing shared contract drift, and treating integration behavior as unverified until runtime validation occurs.