v14-eval-ops

Designs evaluations, scorecards, and release gates for prompt and agent quality control.

Updated May 22, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/handaeho/Harness_Engineering --skill v14-eval-ops-handaeho
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: v14-eval-ops
Source: https://github.com/handaeho/Harness_Engineering/tree/main/prompt-stack/_legacy/_cold_storage/legacy_older_versions/v14/codex/skills/v14-eval-ops
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/handaeho/Harness_Engineering --skill v14-eval-ops-handaeho

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve? Teams shipping prompts, agents, or workflows often lack a disciplined way to compare versions, detect regressions, and decide whether a candidate is release-ready, leading to decisions based on vibes rather than evidence. ## Core Features & Use Cases - Evaluation Design: Select the right evaluation surface, define contract-first acceptance criteria, and build metric taxonomies tied to actual decisions. - Regression and Drift Analysis: Compare baseline versus candidate behavior, detect semantic drift, coverage regression, and anomalies without being misled by noisy single points. - Release Gating: Define gates with owners, thresholds, and actions for rollout, canary continuation, and prompt-version promotion. - Use Case: When comparing two prompt versions before rollout, use this Skill to build a scorecard with weighted criteria, identify critical-cohort failures, and produce a release recommendation with explicit evidence and unresolved risks. ## Quick Start Use the v14-eval-ops skill to compare the baseline and candidate prompt versions and produce a release-readiness scorecard with regression findings.

Frequently Asked Questions about v14-eval-ops

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
Why do averages hide serious evaluation failures?

Averages can mask severe failures in small but critical cohorts, such as safety regressions affecting a minority of cases. Surface critical-cohort failures separately and treat safety regressions more strictly than cosmetic ones.