V3 DDD Architecture

Decompose monolithic application architectures into modular, domain-driven bounded contexts.

2|Updated Apr 7, 2026
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/acarmonag/ai-runbook-automation --skill v3-ddd-architecture-acarmonag
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: V3 DDD Architecture
Source: https://github.com/acarmonag/ai-runbook-automation/tree/main/.claude/skills/v3-ddd-architecture
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/acarmonag/ai-runbook-automation --skill v3-ddd-architecture-acarmonag

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill addresses the technical debt caused by monolithic god objects in the claude-flow v3 codebase by providing a structured path to decompose logic into isolated, maintainable bounded contexts.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Domain Decomposition: Breaks down large orchestrator objects into focused domains like task management, session handling, and health monitoring.
  • Clean Architecture Implementation: Enforces strict dependency inversion, ensuring the domain layer remains independent of infrastructure and presentation concerns.
  • Plugin System: Enables a microkernel pattern where optional features can be added as independent plugins without bloating the core.

Quick Start

Execute the architecture analysis task to begin mapping the current god object into defined bounded contexts.

Frequently Asked Questions about V3 DDD Architecture

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I refactor a monolithic god object into bounded contexts using domain-driven design?

You can break down large orchestrator objects by mapping them into focused domains such as task management, session handling, and health monitoring, establishing isolated bounded contexts to improve maintainability and testability.

What is the best way to enforce clean architecture layers during a DDD refactoring?

Enforcing clean architecture layers requires applying strict dependency inversion, ensuring the domain layer remains completely independent of infrastructure and presentation concerns throughout the decomposition process.

Can I implement a microkernel pattern to add optional features as independent plugins?

You can implement a microkernel pattern to add optional features as independent plugins without bloating the core, maintaining loose coupling between system components through event-driven communication.

How do I transition from monolithic application architectures to modular domain-driven bounded contexts?

Transitioning from monolithic application architectures to modular bounded contexts requires mapping current god objects into defined domains, enforcing dependency inversion, and establishing event-driven communication for loose coupling.

Does domain decomposition require decoupling system components through event-driven communication?

Domain decomposition utilizes event-driven communication to ensure loose coupling between isolated system components, allowing bounded contexts like task management and health monitoring to operate independently.

When should I decompose monolithic orchestrator objects into isolated domains?

You should decompose monolithic orchestrator objects into isolated domains when technical debt from god objects impedes maintainability, requiring a structured transition to clean architecture layers and modular bounded contexts.