V3 DDD Architecture

Decompose claude-flow v3 into bounded contexts using Domain-Driven Design.

2|Updated Jul 26, 2019
One-click install
npx skills add https://github.com/qiphon/learn --skill v3-ddd-architecture-qiphon
Or copy as Structured Prompt for Agent
Please help me install this Agent Skill.
Skill: V3 DDD Architecture
Source: https://github.com/qiphon/learn/tree/main/.opencode/skills/v3-ddd-architecture
Command: npx skills add https://github.com/qiphon/learn --skill v3-ddd-architecture-qiphon

SYSTEM DOCUMENTATION & REQUIREMENTS

What problem does it solve?

This skill helps teams refactor claude-flow v3 from a monolithic god object into modular, bounded contexts using Domain-Driven Design principles, enabling cleaner separation of concerns and better maintainability.

Core Features & Use Cases

  • Bounded contexts and domain boundaries organized for modular development
  • Microkernel-like architecture with clear domain responsibilities and plug-in extensions
  • Migration guidance from a single orchestrator to discrete, testable domains

Quick Start

Begin by identifying core domains in claude-flow v3, define their boundaries, and create a minimal task-management domain scaffold to replace the god object.

Frequently Asked Questions about V3 DDD Architecture

High-intent search queries and answers about installing and using this skill.

FAQPage Schema
How do I refactor a monolithic orchestrator into bounded contexts using domain-driven design?

Applying domain-driven design to orchestrator-based systems decomposes a god object into modular bounded contexts with clear domain responsibilities, plug-in extensions, and event-driven interactions for better maintainability.

What is the best way to decompose a god object into modular domains for claude-flow v3?

The best way to decompose a god object for claude-flow v3 is to apply a microkernel architecture with clear domain responsibilities, event-driven interactions, and domain plugins to enforce strict domain boundaries and clean interfaces.

How does a microkernel architecture handle domain boundaries and event-driven interactions?

A microkernel architecture handles domain boundaries by establishing a modular core with plug-in extensions, enforcing domain boundaries, and routing event-driven interactions between discrete, testable domains to eliminate monolithic coupling.

Can I use domain-driven design to migrate an orchestrator-based system into domain plugins?

Yes, you can use domain-driven design to migrate an orchestrator-based system by following a phased migration plan that replaces a single orchestrator with discrete domains, clean interfaces, and domain plugin extensions.

When should I consider modular DDD architecture over keeping a monolithic orchestrator?

You should consider modular DDD architecture when your monolithic orchestrator becomes a god object that hinders maintainability, requiring bounded contexts, event-driven interactions, and clean interfaces to separate domain concerns effectively.