validating-business-logic-against-code

To verify code implementation against business logic, you map documented rules to actual code evidence by searching the codebase. This process categorizes rules as implemented, partially implemented, contradicted, or not found to ensure compliance.

Gap analysis for business logic validation is the process of identifying discrepancies between documented rules and actual code. It highlights missing implementations, contradictions, and hidden behaviors to prevent bugs and unmet requirements.

You map business rules to code evidence by systematically linking each requirement to specific file paths and code snippets. This requires using search tools like Grep and Glob to locate the exact code enforcing the rules.

Yes, you can check for contradicted or partially implemented rules by validating the documented business logic against the codebase. The validation categorizes each rule's implementation status to highlight gaps and unintended side effects.

Yes, validating business logic against code requires Grep and Glob tools for code searching and file path identification. These tools are necessary to systematically locate the code evidence that enforces the mapped business rules.

You need code validation against business requirements after updating rules, such as changing user authentication logic, to verify the code correctly enforces the new rule and prevents discrepancies that lead to compliance issues.