Validating Review Feedback

Validate review feedback against your implementation plan to classify suggested changes as in-scope, out-of-scope, or unclear. This Skill systematically compares reviewer comments to your plan, flags misaligned items, and prompts you to decide whether to fix, reject, or defer each out-of-scope suggestion, keeping your project on track.

Categorize blocking review items against your plan, then make explicit decisions on each conflict: apply the fix if aligned, reject it if out-of-scope, or defer it for future work. The Skill annotates reviews with decision tags ([FIX], [WONTFIX], [DEFERRED]) and updates your plan, ensuring all decisions are documented and traceable.

Yes. This Skill is designed for orchestration workflows where code review happens as part of plan execution. After each review checkpoint, it validates feedback against your current plan, reconciles misalignments, and updates the plan with deferred items before dispatching fixes to agents.

The Skill prompts you with explicit decision points for each out-of-scope or unclear item. You choose to fix it (adding to current work), reject it (close without action), or defer it (add to the plan for later). Your decision is annotated in the review and the plan is updated accordingly.

Unclear items are flagged separately during feedback categorization. The Skill asks you to clarify the reviewer's intent: decide whether it belongs in scope, is out of scope, or should be deferred. This prevents misinterpretations from causing rework or delays.

No. The Skill annotates the review file with decision tags and automatically updates your plan with deferred items, creating a clear audit trail. Deferred feedback is tracked in the plan for visibility and future prioritization.